Monday, May 23, 2016

Early Classical Era



Early Classical Era:


While taking a class in Social Psychology during the fall of 2015 (not many months ago really), I learned just how selective and faulty memories of our species often are.  Perhaps that is one reason I do not recall learning much about the Chinese, Persian and Indian Empires while taking a high school World History class many moons ago.  Alternatively, since World History was almost as equally vast a subject then as it is now, maybe my teacher only had enough time to cover the Egyptian, Grecian and Roman civilizations.  On the other hand, since the Egyptian, Grecian and Roman civilizations heavily influenced the later development of “western civilizations” to which the United States belongs; U.S. educational systems may have chosen to focus most on those three civilizations.  Whatever the reason, it was refreshing to learn about the empires of Persia, China and India in Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer.


While Strayer mentions on page 144 that, “historians frequently cringe as politicians and students use (and perhaps misuse) historical analogies to make their case for particular points of view in the present,” the temptation is too great to let pass.  Though I am no expert on history or the current affairs of the United States, I could not help noticing possible similarities between problems leading to the demise of the Chinese and Roman Empires and some difficulties the U.S. appears to have now.  On page 139, Strayer indicates both empires “got too big, too overextended, and too expensive to be sustained by the available resources, and no fundamental technological breakthrough was available to enlarge these resources.”  The U.S. may have sufficient means to create technological breakthroughs that could help sustain itself with the resources available, however, things like the growing U.S. National Debt, the high cost of the “war on terror,” an extensive dependency on oil, an ever increasing income gap, etc. make me wonder if we should not revisit history to ensure we are not repeating an ill-fated pattern.


I was also struck by the line “the growth of large landowning families with huge estates and political clout enabled them to avoid paying taxes, turned free peasants into impoverished tenant farmers, and diminished the authority of the central government,” as well as the line, “rivalry among elite factions created instability in both empires and eroded imperial authority.”  If I am not mistaken, the tax on the wealthy in the U.S. is currently at one of the lowest rates in the history of the country.  Wealthy individuals and corporations have used their financial and political power to find ways to avoid paying taxes.  While their wealth increases, the majority of the population appears to be headed towards the state of “impoverished tenant farmers.”  I also believe our most recent congress was deemed the least effective and productive in the history of Congress.  Many citizens are so disheartened with the ineffectiveness of the U.S. political system; they are opting not to participate in the electoral process.

It seems like the U.S. and perhaps much of the globe needs a cultural and political revolution; hopefully, one that is non-violent.  Upon a brief review of the history of no longer existent civilizations, it appears to avoid repeating past negative historical patterns, we need to shift our values away from a profit and surplus driven society towards one of sustainability and benevolence.  With all the knowledge available in this information and technological age, there must be a way to ensure everyone can not only satisfy the basic needs of food, shelter, and clothing, but thrive in life. In addition to ensuring people's basic needs are met, things like providing truly equal educational opportunities and access to affordable health care for all would help the majority of individuals thrive.  Achieving such socially responsible goals may require many of us to “acquire” less material possessions throughout our lives, but we would still have plenty.  It seems like enabling as many people as possible to have quality lives would improve the lives of all.  Attaining wealth and privilege at times appears insatiable and often comes at the cost of others.  Do wealth and privilege provide true freedom?